TGA vs MFDS: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison
Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of TGA (Australia) vs MFDS (South Korea).
TGA
Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
Australia
The TGA regulates medical devices in Australia under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Australia uses a risk-based classification system aligned with GHTF/IMDRF. The TGA is an MDSAP participating author…
Class I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD
ARTG inclusion via conformity assessment
- ▸ARTG registration
- ▸Conformity assessment
- ▸MDSAP participation
- ▸Adverse event reporting
- ▸Post-market surveillance
MFDS
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (South Korea)
South Korea
MFDS regulates medical devices in South Korea using a four-class system. The Korean Good Manufacturing Practice (KGMP) standard is required for all manufacturers. South Korea is an MDSAP participating…
Class I, II, III, IV
MFDS registration
- ▸KGMP compliance
- ▸Technical documentation review
- ▸MDSAP participation
- ▸Clinical trial approval
- ▸Device registration
MedFlux monitors both TGA and MFDS in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.
COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →