§ COMPARE REGULATORS

MFDS vs ANVISA: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of MFDS (South Korea) vs ANVISA (Brazil).

MFDS

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (South Korea)

South Korea

MFDS regulates medical devices in South Korea using a four-class system. The Korean Good Manufacturing Practice (KGMP) standard is required for all manufacturers. South Korea is an MDSAP participating

CLASSES

Class I, II, III, IV

PATHWAY

MFDS registration

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • KGMP compliance
  • Technical documentation review
  • MDSAP participation
  • Clinical trial approval
  • Device registration

ANVISA

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brazil)

Brazil

ANVISA regulates medical devices in Brazil using a four-class risk-based system. Brazil is an MDSAP participating country. ANVISA requires a Brazilian Registration Holder (BRH) for foreign manufacture

CLASSES

Class I, II, III, IV

PATHWAY

ANVISA cadastro (Class I-II) / registro (Class III-IV)

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration (cadastro/registro)
  • Brazilian Registration Holder requirement
  • MDSAP participation
  • GMP (INMETRO) certification
  • ANVISA Technical Opinion

MedFlux monitors both MFDS and ANVISA in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS