§ COMPARE REGULATORS

ANVISA vs SFDA: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of ANVISA (Brazil) vs SFDA (Saudi Arabia).

ANVISA

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brazil)

Brazil

ANVISA regulates medical devices in Brazil using a four-class risk-based system. Brazil is an MDSAP participating country. ANVISA requires a Brazilian Registration Holder (BRH) for foreign manufacture

CLASSES

Class I, II, III, IV

PATHWAY

ANVISA cadastro (Class I-II) / registro (Class III-IV)

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration (cadastro/registro)
  • Brazilian Registration Holder requirement
  • MDSAP participation
  • GMP (INMETRO) certification
  • ANVISA Technical Opinion

SFDA

Saudi Food and Drug Authority

Saudi Arabia

The SFDA regulates medical devices in Saudi Arabia under the Medical Devices Interim Regulation. Saudi Arabia is increasingly aligning with international standards (IMDRF) and has introduced mandatory

CLASSES

Class A, B, C, D

PATHWAY

SFDA device listing / market authorization

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device listing (MDMA)
  • Conformity assessment
  • Adverse event reporting
  • GCC harmonization
  • Import control

MedFlux monitors both ANVISA and SFDA in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS