§ COMPARE REGULATORS

TGA vs HSA: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of TGA (Australia) vs HSA (Singapore).

TGA

Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)

Australia

The TGA regulates medical devices in Australia under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Australia uses a risk-based classification system aligned with GHTF/IMDRF. The TGA is an MDSAP participating author

CLASSES

Class I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD

PATHWAY

ARTG inclusion via conformity assessment

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • ARTG registration
  • Conformity assessment
  • MDSAP participation
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Post-market surveillance

HSA

Health Sciences Authority (Singapore)

Singapore

Singapore's HSA regulates medical devices using a four-class risk-based system (A, B, C, D). HSA accepts conformity assessment from recognized bodies and is a founding member of IMDRF. Singapore serve

CLASSES

Class A, B, C, D

PATHWAY

HSA registration

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration (Class B-D)
  • Class A dealer license
  • GN-13 guidance compliance
  • Adverse event reporting
  • IMDRF participation

MedFlux monitors both TGA and HSA in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS