§ COMPARE REGULATORS

TGA vs BfArM: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of TGA (Australia) vs BfArM (Germany).

TGA

Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)

Australia

The TGA regulates medical devices in Australia under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Australia uses a risk-based classification system aligned with GHTF/IMDRF. The TGA is an MDSAP participating author

CLASSES

Class I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD

PATHWAY

ARTG inclusion via conformity assessment

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • ARTG registration
  • Conformity assessment
  • MDSAP participation
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Post-market surveillance

BfArM

BfArM — Germany Medical Device Regulatory Authority

Germany

BfArM is the national regulatory authority responsible for medical device oversight in Germany. It manages device registration, market surveillance, and adverse event reporting within the Europe regul

CLASSES

EU MDR classes

PATHWAY

BfArM registration

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration
  • Market surveillance
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Import/export control

MedFlux monitors both TGA and BfArM in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS