§ COMPARE REGULATORS

ANVISA vs SAHPRA: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of ANVISA (Brazil) vs SAHPRA (South Africa).

ANVISA

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brazil)

Brazil

ANVISA regulates medical devices in Brazil using a four-class risk-based system. Brazil is an MDSAP participating country. ANVISA requires a Brazilian Registration Holder (BRH) for foreign manufacture

CLASSES

Class I, II, III, IV

PATHWAY

ANVISA cadastro (Class I-II) / registro (Class III-IV)

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration (cadastro/registro)
  • Brazilian Registration Holder requirement
  • MDSAP participation
  • GMP (INMETRO) certification
  • ANVISA Technical Opinion

SAHPRA

SAHPRA — South Africa Medical Device Regulatory Authority

South Africa

SAHPRA is the national regulatory authority responsible for medical device oversight in South Africa. It manages device registration, market surveillance, and adverse event reporting within the Africa

CLASSES

Class A, B, C, D

PATHWAY

SAHPRA registration

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration
  • Market surveillance
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Import/export control

MedFlux monitors both ANVISA and SAHPRA in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS