§ COMPARE REGULATORS

TGA vs SAHPRA: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison

Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of TGA (Australia) vs SAHPRA (South Africa).

TGA

Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)

Australia

The TGA regulates medical devices in Australia under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Australia uses a risk-based classification system aligned with GHTF/IMDRF. The TGA is an MDSAP participating author

CLASSES

Class I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD

PATHWAY

ARTG inclusion via conformity assessment

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • ARTG registration
  • Conformity assessment
  • MDSAP participation
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Post-market surveillance

SAHPRA

SAHPRA — South Africa Medical Device Regulatory Authority

South Africa

SAHPRA is the national regulatory authority responsible for medical device oversight in South Africa. It manages device registration, market surveillance, and adverse event reporting within the Africa

CLASSES

Class A, B, C, D

PATHWAY

SAHPRA registration

KEY FUNCTIONS
  • Device registration
  • Market surveillance
  • Adverse event reporting
  • Import/export control

MedFlux monitors both TGA and SAHPRA in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.

COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →

§ OTHER COMPARISONS