TGA vs COFEPRIS: Medical Device Regulatory Comparison
Compare the medical device registration pathways, classification, and regulatory requirements of TGA (Australia) vs COFEPRIS (Mexico).
TGA
Therapeutic Goods Administration (Australia)
Australia
The TGA regulates medical devices in Australia under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. Australia uses a risk-based classification system aligned with GHTF/IMDRF. The TGA is an MDSAP participating author…
Class I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD
ARTG inclusion via conformity assessment
- ▸ARTG registration
- ▸Conformity assessment
- ▸MDSAP participation
- ▸Adverse event reporting
- ▸Post-market surveillance
COFEPRIS
Federal Commission for Protection against Health Risks (Mexico)
Mexico
COFEPRIS regulates medical devices in Mexico under the General Health Law. Mexico uses a three-class system (I, II, III). A sanitary registration (registro sanitario) is required for Class II and III …
Class I, II, III
COFEPRIS sanitary registration
- ▸Sanitary registration
- ▸FDA/EU recognition pathway
- ▸GMP compliance
- ▸Import permits
- ▸Vigilance reporting
MedFlux monitors both TGA and COFEPRIS in real time — every regulatory change, safety alert, and market signal delivered in under 90 seconds.
COMPARE LIVE DATA FREE →